Activist Conservative on the Bench

Update 482 – ACB Stands For…
Activist Conservative on the Bench

Observers of this week’s hearings in Senate Judiciary on the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett could not have missed the raging tax law question confronting the Court. Economic policy hides on the Court’s docket but that’s the ACA’s constitutionality on the line November 10, just in time for Barrett to hear.

What does Amy Coney Barrett stand for?  This, you could have missed. Amy Coney Barrett claims to be apolitical, an originalist, strict constructionist, not policy-driven. But these terms are a smokescreen, hiding the conservative activist behind the curtain. She demonstrates this more clearly than she wants, e.g., as the lone dissenter in Kanter v. Barr, see below. 

What are the economic policy stakes and implications of another conservative activist on the bench?

Good weekends, all….



President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the vacancy left by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. But Ginsburg was a progressive juggernaut, Barrett is the inverse: a staunchly conservative activist set to tear down the Affordable Care Act, progressive taxation, and voting rights. During this week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Barrett’s nomination, Barrett evaded questions about how she might rule on the bench. Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham has set Barrett’s confirmation vote for next week. 

Below, we assess the economic and democratic ramifications of Barrett’s impending confirmation and the absurdity that is the conservative judicial philosophy of originalism.

Economic Implications

Barrett’s presumed confirmation will have profound economic and public health implications for the country. Her record demonstrates a clear preference for companies over workers and consumers. While at the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Barrett sided with corporations over individuals and employees an astounding 76 percent of the time. Her record is worrisome on many major issues: 

  • Healthcare: Oral arguments for a case that will decide the future of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will begin on November 10, and Barrett’s opposition to the legislation is clear. In a 2017 essay, Barrett argued that in his majority opinion in NFIB v. Sebelius (2012), Chief Justice John Roberts “pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute.” Roberts’s decision rested on interpreting the ACA individual mandate penalty as constitutional under Congress’s taxing power. Barrett also praised Scalia’s 2015 dissent in another case that challenged the ACA when he called the majority’s defense of the law “pure applesauce.” 

    Based on Barrett’s history, it’s almost certain that she will cast a deciding vote in favor of dismantling the ACA. If the ACA is repealed, approximately 29.8 million Americans will be left without health insurance amid a pandemic. Repeal would also be a tax windfall for the wealthy, decreasing taxes for the top 0.1 percent by an average of $198,000 per year. 
  • Consumer Protections: Barrett’s record on consumer protections is abysmal. In Cheryl Dalton v. Teva North America, et al (2018), Barrett sided with a pharmaceutical company when it was sued by a woman forced to undergo a hysterectomy due to damage from a faulty IUD. In another case, Barrett declined to reconsider a case that ruled that the Federal Trade Commission could not seek restitution for victims of consumer fraud, overturning precedent and weakening the agency.
  • Employment Discrimination Protections: In Dale E. Kleber v. CareFusion Corporation (2019), Barrett ruled that protections against age discrimination that apply to employees did not apply to job applicants. In another case, Barrett upheld a policy of racially segregating employees. 
  • Worker’s Rights: Barrett sided against workers suing for overtime pay and ruled that gig workers would need to go through mandatory arbitration in wage disputes. The nominee also ruled in Bigger v. Facebook Inc. (2019) that employees covered by arbitration agreements would be blocked from receiving notice of class action suits against their employers. 
  • Antitrust: Barrett’s record on antitrust law is not as clear. The nominee has ruled on six appellate panels that have decided antitrust cases, but she wrote none of those opinions — nor did she dissent or concur in any of them. Wednesday’s confirmation proceedings offered a little insight; in an exchange with Sen. Klobuchar, Barrett said that the text of the Sherman Act is broad and that antitrust law is consequently “controlled by precedent.” Precedent thus far has overwhelming favored companies, expanding immunity protections for companies. 

Democratic Process

President Trump’s strategy to steal the 2020 election is clear: if mail-in votes start to push Biden towards victory, Trump and the Republicans will go to the courts and attempt to disqualify millions of ballots. Barrett could cast a deciding vote in a case before SCOTUS and determine the election result, overturning the will of the people. On Tuesday, Barrett declined to say whether she would recuse herself from any case involving a dispute over the November election.

Barrett was asked by Sens. Feinstein and Durbin if the president had the power to unilaterally delay the election and, refusing to answer, claimed that she couldn’t answer hypothetical questions without making herself a “legal pundit.” But Article II of the Constitution clearly empowers Congress to choose the timing of the general election, a date previously set by an 1845 federal law. In her exchange with Sen. Durbin, Barrett had no difficulty in answering a similarly clear-cut question regarding the constitutionality of rescinding an individual’s right to vote based on race. Barrett’s non-answer on Constitutional issues when they pertain to presidential authority is a major cause for concern. 

Barrett’s record on voting rights is sparse, but her decision in Kanter v. Barr (2019) sheds some light on her views on the right to vote. In her lone dissent, Barrett argued that, unlike owning a gun, the right to vote was not an “individual” right. Her dissent expressed the view that only “virtuous citizens” truly possessed the right to vote, an assertion that has no precedent in the Constitution and openly violates the 14th Amendment. 


Like many of the conservative justices on the Supreme Court, Judge Barrett abides by originalism, the doctrine which purports to interpret the Constitution only as the Founders intended. Originalists claim that their judicial philosophy avoids the activism of liberal justices, who bend the law to justify their progressive agenda. But originalism is neither consistent nor objective; the Founders themselves fiercely disagreed on the meaning of the Constitution. 

Barrett is a conservative activist who has broken with originalism to forward her conservative agenda on issues like gun rights. On Wednesday, Sen. Durbin brought up Barrett’s decision in Kanter in which Barrett was the lone dissenter. Barrett argued that the plaintiff’s felony conviction for Medicare fraud should not legally prevent him from owning a firearm, even though Wisconsin law states that anyone with a felony conviction is barred from gun ownership. Barrett further argued that because the plaintiff’s conviction was not for a violent crime, Wisconsin’s law was unconstitutional. Yet, Barrett’s reading of the Second Amendment distorted the Founders’ meaning, which was intended to apply only to militia members. There is also no legal precedent that distinguishes between violent and nonviolent criminals for the purposes of gun ownership. 

Barrett shares her originalist principles with the late Justice Antonin Scalia, for whom she clerked. Fittingly, Scalia also broke with originalism to support his conservative gun rights agenda in the case District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) when he rebuked 200 years of precedent to reinterpret the Second Amendment as an individual rather than a civic right. 

Although Barrett’s record on economic policy is sparse, Scalia’s and other originalists may offer some foresight into how Barrett may rule on such issues. Justice Scalia’s originalism led to his siding with the majority in the disastrous Citizens United v. FEC (2010) decision, which opened the floodgates for elite domineering of the political process. In his concurring opinion, Scalia stated that unlimited corporate donations were something to be celebrated. If we take Barrett at her word (and her slim record), a SCOTUS with Barrett would promote the same agenda.

53 thoughts on “Activist Conservative on the Bench”

  1. Hello, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam feedback? If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any support is very much appreciated.

  2. Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of
    the images aren’t loading properly. I’m not sure why but I think its
    a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different browsers and both show the same outcome.
    asmr 0mniartist

  3. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great.
    I don’t know who you are but certainly you’re going
    to a famous blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!

  4. It is the best time to make some plans for the future and
    it is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I desire
    to suggest you few interesting things or advice.

    Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I desire to read more things about it!

  5. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject matter
    stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience over that you
    wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.

  6. It is appropriate time to make some plans for the
    future and it is time to be happy. I have read this post
    and if I could I desire to suggest you few interesting things or suggestions.
    Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article.

    I want to read even more things about it!

  7. Thanks for every other informative website. The place else may just I get that type of information written in such a perfect method? I’ve a undertaking that I am simply now running on, and I’ve been at the look out for such information.

  8. I do trust all of the ideas you’ve presented on your post. They’re really convincing and will certainly work.

    Nonetheless, the posts are very quick for beginners. May just you please extend them a little from subsequent time?
    Thanks for the post.

  9. My brother recommended I might like this web site.
    He was entirely right. This post truly made my day. You cann’t imagine just how much time I
    had spent for this info! Thanks!

  10. Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The text in your article seem to be running off the screen in Ie.
    I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with web browser compatibility
    but I figured I’d post to let you know. The design look great
    though! Hope you get the issue solved soon. Thanks

  11. Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your
    site and in accession capital to assert that I get actually enjoyed account your blog posts.
    Any way I’ll be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently fast.

  12. Hey very cool blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your website and take the feeds also…I’m happy to find so many useful information here in the post, we need work out more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  13. scoliosis
    Nice post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed!
    Very helpful information specifically the last part
    🙂 I care for such information much. I was seeking this particular info
    for a long time. Thank you and good luck. scoliosis

  14. scoliosis
    Spot on with this write-up, I really believe that this website needs
    a great deal more attention. I’ll probably be returning to see more, thanks for the
    advice! scoliosis

  15. dating sites
    It’s perfect time to make some plans for the future and
    it is time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I want to suggest you some interesting things
    or suggestions. Maybe you could write next articles referring to this article.
    I desire to read more things about it! dating sites

  16. I’m gone to inform my little brother, that he should also go to see this webpage
    on regular basis to take updated from newest information.

  17. What’s Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It
    positively useful and it has aided me out loads. I’m hoping to contribute & help different users like its aided me.
    Good job.

  18. I’m curious to find out what blog platform you’re utilizing?

    I’m having some small security problems with
    my latest website and I’d like to find something more
    safe. Do you have any solutions?

  19. I just like the helpful info you supply on your
    articles. I’ll bookmark your blog and take a look at again here regularly.
    I am rather sure I will be informed many new stuff right
    here! Good luck for the following!

  20. Good day I am so excited I found your blog, I really found you by mistake, while
    I was looking on Askjeeve for something else, Regardless
    I am here now and would just like to say cheers for a marvelous post and a all round thrilling blog (I also love the theme/design),
    I don’t have time to go through it all at the minute but
    I have saved it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have
    time I will be back to read much more, Please do keep up the awesome job.

  21. Hello! I could have sworn I’ve visited your blog before but after going through many
    of the posts I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m certainly delighted
    I discovered it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back often!

  22. If some one wants expert view regarding running a blog after
    that i suggest him/her to pay a quick visit
    this weblog, Keep up the pleasant job.

  23. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I to find this matter to be actually something which I feel I’d by no means understand. It kind of feels too complicated and extremely wide for me. I am taking a look ahead in your next post, I will try to get the grasp of it!

  24. I think this is among the most important info for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The site style is great, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

  25. Pingback: keto diet before and after 1 month

  26. Admiring the time and effort you put into your site and detailed information you offer.
    It’s good to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same outdated rehashed
    information. Wonderful read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *