Federal Bailout Policy 2020

Update 434 — Federal Bailout Policy 2020:
Picking Winners/Losers vs. Sacrificing Jobs

The political toxicity of bailouts was perhaps best conveyed by former Republican South Carolina Governor, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N, and Boeing Director Nikki Haley, who quit her Board seat last month, saying “I cannot support a … federal bailout that prioritizes our company over others.” That’s usually what Directors do. And that’s always what bailouts do. 

Haley may be a candidate for office again someday, also true of members of Congress. But Congress did not agree with Haley and carved out funds intended for her company in the Corona III package. See, Boeing employs 153,000 people. That’s a fraction of one percent of those who have lost their jobs in the past month. 

Below, we explore the profits, the perils, the imperatives, and the key principles behind federal bailout policy 2020. 

Best,

Dana

———-

The CARES Act, signed by President Trump in March, injected $2.2 trillion into the economy, including billions in funds to rescue firms on the verge of bankruptcy. The 2008 financial crisis demonstrated that bailouts can save whole sectors if they go well, but carry withering political risk if not. 

Bailouts entail massive reverse transfer payments from taxpayers and decide winners and losers in our economy. In the CARES Act bailouts, the public policy imperative in distributing the kind of relief is obscure in macroeconomic terms. 

Americans deserve a more coherent vision for bailout policy. Below, we evaluate the administration’s bailout policy in regards to aviation and hospitals, look at the lessons learned from 2008, and suggest a different approach going forward.

Current Bailout Policy, by Sector

In response to the 2008 financial crisis, the federal government created the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), a $700 billion bailout program for the financial sector and the auto industry. TARP injected cash into companies by buying shares and debt. Its proponents argued the failure of the financial sector would drive us into a depression.

While the Great Recession resulted from reckless lending and banking practices, our current economic downturn is a result of a pandemic. Unlike in 2008, the federal government is avoiding taking equity stakes in companies, it is instead focusing on backstopping Federal Reserve lending facilities. But some struggling industries like aviation and healthcare are receiving direct federal assistance. 

The potential blowback of the term “bailout” is clearly a concern for the Trump administration. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin said, “This is not a bailout. This is considering providing certain things for certain industries.”

Aviation

The CARES Act appropriated $25 billion to passenger airlines, $4 billion to air cargo carriers, and $3 billion to airline contractors in payroll protection grants and loans. Last week, the Treasury dispersed the first tranche of funding to the airliners totaling $12.4 billion.

Passenger airliners struck a deal with the Treasury Department earlier this month. Airline companies awarded over $100 million in aid will receive 70 percent of the funds as grants and 30 percent as loans. In return, the Treasury will receive stock warrants equal to 10 percent of the loan amount. Airline companies that receive bailout money are banned from laying off or furloughing employees through September, cutting pay or benefits, buying back stocks, and providing bonuses to CEOs. 

This is a questionable use of taxpayer money for a few reasons. Yes, airlines are suffering. As are cruise lines, hotel chains, theme parks, and ballparks. Also suffering are their suppliers of parts, those transporting them, and those feeding them. Here, an oligopoly of a sector that tacks on irrational fees, provides no customer support, and increases prices while decreasing quality of service is being bailed out after one bad quarter.

Hospitals

The CARES Act and the recent supplement package provided $175 billion in federal funds to hospitals and healthcare providers for coronavirus-related costs. During a pandemic, providing additional funds to hospitals makes sense fiscally and from a public health perspective. Should more hospitals have to go under, both the pandemic and the economic devastation would worsen.

The CARES Act does not require the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) to consider hospitals’ financial assets when distributing funds, so small hospitals must compete with large, wealthy hospitals. Because the CARES Act does not require HHS to consider the financial assets of hospitals’ owners, private equity firms that own hospitals and push them into debt have indirectly received bailout funds. 

Lessons from 2008

Despite taking equity, the government made only a small return from TARP. The Congressional Oversight Panel (COP) found that the government did not take enough equity in return for the risk. The federal government also did not demand that banks receiving bailout funds increase lending, so they didn’t. Banks were still lending at decreased levels four years after the crisis. 

The response to the 2008 recession focused on helping the culprits over the victims of the economic downturn. During the recovery, corporate profits quickly rebounded, but median household income did not return to pre-crisis levels until 2016. Our federal bailout strategy should seek to ensure that workers can keep their jobs with adequate pay and benefits.

A New Bailout Policy 

The administration has directed corporate assistance primarily through Fed lending facilities rather than direct assistance. But the Fed faces limitations for lending to businesses facing insolvency — the businesses that would need a direct bailout most. Some industries may require a true bailout rather than just liquidity from the Fed. But before we bail out another industry, policymakers should establish a clear set of bailout policy objectives and priorities.

  • Maintain Employment: A key lesson from the 2008 crisis was that many Americans believed TARP prioritized corporations’ welfare over individuals’ welfare. We must stipulate that any bailout funds first go to keeping workers on payrolls. Once a company has its payroll covered, it could use the remainder of the grant to shore up other parts of the business.
  • Prioritize Critical Sectors: The size, centrality, and presence or lack of demand is a better proxy for bailout eligibility than one that puts airlines at the front of the line. The key question in triaging bailout funds is whether the failure of the industry will have spillover effects in the economy. In 2008, the financial industry posed this risk, which necessitated its bailout. At the time, banks were also unable to go through a fast and orderly bankruptcy process, which is an option available to airlines.

    Bailout recipients cannot simply be the most politically connected or loudest voices but should be companies with no other financial options and whose failure would unquestionably drive us further into economic contraction or prolong the health crisis. 
  • Create Potential for ROI: If the government decides to bail out a large public company, it should structure bailouts as grants but also ensure it gets a return by receiving equity options. The condition for equity helps separate the companies who truly need a bailout versus those who are looking for a handout. While Boeing was to receive billions in aid from the CARES Act, the company balked at giving up equity in return for assistance. But if a company needs a bailout, it should be willing to give the government an equity stake. The ability to repay should not be a bar to eligibility but means the bailout terms can be more favorable to the taxpayer.
  • Robust Oversight: When it comes to managing bailouts, the lesson from the 2008 recession is that the government should require accountability. The COP in 2008 was toothless; the Congressional Oversight Commission today should have subpoena power, the ability to swear in witnesses, and independent enforcement authority.

Bailout policy as pursued by the administration and Congress in response to the coronavirus has been a part of the relief efforts in Corona bills I-III — money for damage but not desert. Instead, policymakers should resist the siren call of the ad hoc and the connected and invest taxpayer money where it will maintain truly essential services and might even provide a return. 

35 thoughts on “Federal Bailout Policy 2020”

  1. Hi! I realize this is somewhat off-topic however I had to ask.
    Does running a well-established blog like yours take a massive amount work?
    I’m brand new to running a blog however I do write in my diary everyday.
    I’d like to start a blog so I can share my own experience
    and thoughts online. Please let me know if you have any ideas or tips for new aspiring bloggers.
    Appreciate it! asmr 0mniartist

  2. Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve visited this site before but after going through some of the posts
    I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m certainly pleased I
    stumbled upon it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back often! 0mniartist asmr

  3. I like the valuable info you provide in your articles.
    I’ll bookmark your blog and check again here regularly.

    I’m quite certain I’ll learn lots of new stuff right here!
    Best of luck for the next! asmr 0mniartist

  4. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be actually
    something which I think I would never understand.
    It seems too complex and very broad for me.
    I am looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

  5. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this
    post was great. I don’t know who you are but definitely you are going to
    a famous blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!

  6. Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Safari.
    I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something
    to do with browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know.

    The layout look great though! Hope you get the issue resolved soon. Cheers

  7. Hi everybody, here every person is sharing these kinds of familiarity, so it’s nice to read this blog, and I used to pay a visit this webpage everyday.

  8. I blog quite often and I truly appreciate your information. This great article has really peaked my interest.
    I am going to book mark your website and keep checking for new details about once a week.

    I subscribed to your RSS feed as well.

  9. First off I want to say awesome blog! I had a quick question that
    I’d like to ask if you don’t mind. I was curious to find out how you center yourself and
    clear your thoughts prior to writing. I have had
    a tough time clearing my mind in getting my ideas out.
    I truly do enjoy writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes
    are generally wasted just trying to figure out how to begin.
    Any ideas or hints? Kudos!

  10. scoliosis
    Today, I went to the beach front with my children. I found a
    sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell
    to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and
    it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is completely off topic but I had to tell someone!

    scoliosis

  11. free dating sites
    Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative.
    I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will be grateful if you continue this in future.

    A lot of people will be benefited from your writing.
    Cheers! free dating sites

  12. I’ve learn some excellent stuff here. Certainly worth bookmarking for revisiting.
    I surprise how so much attempt you set to make this kind of wonderful informative site.

  13. You’re so interesting! I do not think I’ve truly read a single thing like this before.
    So wonderful to find another person with a few genuine thoughts on this subject.
    Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up. This web site is something that is required on the internet,
    someone with a bit of originality!

  14. It is perfect time to make a few plans for the
    future and it’s time to be happy. I’ve read this publish and
    if I may just I desire to recommend you some fascinating things or
    suggestions. Maybe you can write subsequent articles regarding this article.

    I desire to learn more things approximately it!

  15. Good day very cool site!! Man .. Excellent .. Superb ..
    I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally? I’m satisfied
    to search out numerous useful info right here in the publish, we need work out extra techniques in this regard,
    thank you for sharing. . . . . .

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *