Additional Testing Required

Update 450 — Additional Testing Required:
What to Expect from the Fed’s Stress Tests

In a month, we will celebrate the 10th anniversary of the signing of the Dodd-Frank Act, which codified annual Federal Reserve stress testing of major financial institutions to see if they can withstand various hypothetical macroeconomic hardships. No one contemplated COVID then, of course. 

Tomorrow, the Fed will announce results of this year’s stress tests.  No need for hypotheticals in 2020. What will the results show? Will news about the sturdiness of big banks provide credible reassurance as it did in 2009, when it all but single-handedly stopped the economic and capital markets free fall in its tracks? Why not? See below…




When the Federal Reserve releases the results of its stress tests for the country’s 34 largest banks tomorrow, eyes will be watching for failures. Last year, banks skated by without a single one. This year’s tests could be less relevant — even in the midst of a crisis — given that the Fed set the test criteria before the pandemic hit and the data reflects banks’ balance sheets as of last December. Additionally, the Fed and the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA) of 2019 significantly weakened the stress tests.

Below, we analyze the evolution of the stress tests, forecast what we might see tomorrow, and assess the Fed’s massive macro response. 

Once Powerful, Now Weakened

Banking regulators use the Fed’s annual stress tests to assess the adequacy of banks’ capital under difficult economic conditions. The Fed tests how banks’ balance sheets would fare should GDP contract, stock prices plunge, and unemployment rise. If a bank does not have adequate capital, the Fed may restrict the bank from issuing dividends or performing stock buybacks. Arguably worse than the actual penalty is the public shaming in the markets should a bank fail.

The current stress test regime began with the 2008 financial crisis. Before the financial crisis, banks only conducted stress tests internally. The Fed’s release of its first stress test results in May 2009, which showed that 10 of the 19 largest banks had inadequate capital, was a turning point in the crisis. As a result, banks issued more equity to shore up their balance sheets, which helped restore investor confidence. The 2009 tests were regarded in the markets as a success, and stress tests became a part of the enhanced prudential standards.

The Fed has given out only one failing grade since 2018, leading some to question the efficacy of this oversight tool. While banks are better capitalized due to Dodd-Frank reforms, the Fed also weakened the stress tests starting in 2019 by: 

  • Moving Away from Pass/Fail: The stress tests have two portions, one that assesses banks’ capital under a “quantitative” test and another that assesses banks’ internal risk management under a “qualitative” test. Banks have been more likely to fail under the qualitative portion, prompting them to push back on the grounds that it’s more subjective. The Fed lowered the stakes of the qualitative tests, allowing banks to bypass a public Pass/Fail grade if they take the test for four years and pass in the most recent year.
  • The “Textbook”:  In the name of greater transparency, the Fed agreed to release more information to banks about test structures. This concession allows banks to more easily game the system by tailoring their capital plans to meet the test requirements. While critics say this gives banks the questions ahead of the test, Fed Vice Chair Quarles said it’s more like giving banks a “textbook to prepare.”
  • Biennial Tests: The Fed now only tests banks with between $100 and $250 billion in assets on a biennial basis because of the rollback in the EGRRCPA. Some of the larger banks have also pushed to go on a biennial schedule. This year, the Fed is testing the full suite of banks.

COVID – The Real Stress Test

The Fed will report the 2020 stress test results at the aggregate- and firm-level on Thursday. Forecasters expect that, similar to last year, banks will pass fairly easily.

This year’s test scenario was set in February and does not take into account the crisis at hand. Also, the tests are against the banks’ balance sheets from December 2019, a period when the economy was much healthier. The current crisis is arguably harder than the test criteria. Unemployment is hovering around 13 percent, and the Congressional Budget Office projects a 39.6 annualized drop in GDP in Q2. The Fed’s hypothetical “severe” scenario has U.S. GDP dropping 8.5 percent and unemployment hitting 10 percent by Q3 2021. Needless to say, the COVID crisis is much more stressful than this hypothetical “doomsday scenario.”

Additional Testing Required

As a result of the test not being relevant to the current crisis, Fed Vice Chair Randal Quarles announced in April that the banks would undergo additional COVID sensitivity analyses. The additional tests will assess how banks will undergo the stresses of a “V,”  “U,” and  “W” shaped recovery. Failure in any one of these scenarios could result in the Fed potentially restricting dividend payouts. While the Fed will report the results of these tests, they will only release aggregate-level data, not firm-level data, leaving the public without full knowledge of any hobbled banks within the financial system.

Throughout this crisis, U.S. banks have continued to issue dividends, even while banks in Europe and the UK have suspended this practice. In April, Sens. Schatz, Brown, and Warren urged Fed Chair Jerome Powell to restrict bank dividends. They argued that should this be a drawn-out recession, banks should focus on lending to their communities, not repurchasing stocks or paying executive bonuses.

Reaching the Fed’s Limit

The coronavirus crisis has caused one of the most acute economic crises since the Great Depression. But unlike in 2009, the crisis is not centered in the banking sector. The banks — with significant assistance from the Fed — have so far been able to weather the current crisis. Unlike in 2008, the Fed was immediately prepared to step in with emergency lending facilities to ensure that the financial sector remained liquid. The Fed’s balance sheet ballooned from roughly $4.1 trillion in February to $7.1 trillion today. Even before the coronavirus crisis began, the Fed was pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into the repo market.  

All of the facilities rely on recipients being illiquid but fundamentally solvent. The Fed has Herculean powers to keep banks liquid, but it can’t save them from a solvency crisis. As Fed Chair Powell has said numerous times during this crisis, the Fed has lending powers, not spending powers. If the crisis drags on and we face a prolonged “U” or “W” recovery, more businesses will go under, further stressing banks’ balance sheets.

Barring the public from seeing the individual bank-level results from the COVID sensitivity tests undermines the purpose of the tests. When more than half of the banks failed the 2009 stress test, it served as a wake-up call for banks to bolster their balance sheets and restored confidence in the market. Giving the public more information to assess the actual health of the banks will help drive policy to ensure businesses remain solvent throughout the crisis. Congress has the fiscal power to keep the economy from spiraling further downward, but it needs credible data to make those decisions. 

47 thoughts on “Additional Testing Required”

  1. Hi every one, here every one is sharing these kinds of knowledge,
    thus it’s fastidious to read this weblog, and I used to visit this blog daily.
    0mniartist asmr

  2. I simply couldn’t go away your website before suggesting that I actually enjoyed
    the standard info a person supply for your visitors?
    Is going to be again often to investigate cross-check new posts 0mniartist asmr

  3. Одновременно с этим существует и другая сторона формирования и организации высказывания.

  4. I’m no longer positive the place you are getting your info, but good topic.
    I needs to spend a while studying more or
    figuring out more. Thanks for wonderful information I
    used to be searching for this information for my mission.

  5. Hi there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with us so I came
    to take a look. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers!
    Fantastic blog and terrific design and style.

  6. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it
    up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back in the future.
    Many thanks

  7. Howdy! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with us so
    I came to look it over. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m
    book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers!
    Terrific blog and amazing design.

  8. Great post. I was checking constantly this blog and I am impressed!
    Extremely helpful information particularly the last part 🙂 I care for such information a lot.
    I used to be looking for this certain information for a long time.
    Thank you and good luck.

  9. Hello there! I simply wish to give you a big thumbs up for your great information you have got here on this post.
    I will be returning to your website for more

  10. I don’t know if it’s just me or if everyone else
    encountering issues with your blog. It appears like some of the written text within your posts are running off the
    screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me
    know if this is happening to them as well? This may be a
    problem with my browser because I’ve had this happen before.
    Many thanks

  11. scoliosis
    Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Ie.
    I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to
    do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I’d post
    to let you know. The design look great though! Hope you
    get the problem fixed soon. Many thanks scoliosis

  12. It is perfect time to make a few plans for the future and it is time to be happy.
    I have read this publish and if I may I desire to counsel you few fascinating issues
    or advice. Maybe you can write subsequent articles referring to this article.

    I wish to read more issues approximately it!

  13. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was curious what all is needed to get set up?

    I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost
    a pretty penny? I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% certain. Any tips or advice would be
    greatly appreciated. Thanks

  14. Cool blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?

    A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really
    make my blog stand out. Please let me know where you
    got your design. Many thanks

  15. Pretty component to content. I just stumbled upon your web site
    and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your weblog posts.

    Any way I will be subscribing in your feeds or even I fulfillment you get entry to persistently quickly.

  16. Thanks on your marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it,
    you might be a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog
    and will often come back from now on. I want to encourage yourself to continue your great job,
    have a nice morning!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *