Treasury's New Inversions Rule (Apr. 8)

Mike & Co — 

The week opened with an announcement by Treasury of rules designed to curb corporate inversions.  By week’s end, the rules — which take effect on Monday — had their first success, or victim, depending on your perspective, as the proposed $70 billion Pfizer/Allergan merger was called off.  

Secretary Clinton released a statement on the new rules, implying that she would go further than the Treasury by imposing an “exit tax” on any company trying to leave the US to lower its tax bill.   “We need to close the loopholes that let corporations escape paying their taxes.”

Next: a look at Sanders’ statements to the NY Daily News about banks?  Or in/action on the SEC nomination front?  You decide. 

Good weekends all,

Dana 

——–

Operation of the Rules 

Proponents say the rule help to make inversion deals less palatable to foreign firms, while critics claim it only raises the cost of capital for foreign firms doing business in America which will ultimately lead to a decrease in international business activity here.

The main culprit in Treasury’s eyes, is earnings stripping — agent a foreign acquiring company “loans” a large amount of money to its new domestic subsidiary (actually, the U.S. firm just             distributes a note to its parent company and pays interest thereafter), to take advantage of the tax deductibility of interest payments.

Previous rules to curb inversions have led to an increase in mergers between roughly equally sized companies and large foreign firms buying up small American ones.  Monday’s rules will apply to all cross-border combinations, meaning that it will affect companies of any size, leveling the playing field for large, medium, and small businesses which may be inversion targets.

The rule defines related-party debt as stock under certain circumstances.   Under the new rules the IRS would have the authority to designate the note created by these deals as stock, not debt – making the interest payments into dividend payments, not eligible for tax deductions.

Per Treasury: “Specifically, the proposed regulations require key information be documented, including a binding obligation for issuer to repay the principal amount borrowed, creditor’s rights, a reasonable expectation of repayment, and evidence of ongoing debtor-creditor relationship.”

Current inversion laws require that a foreign parent company own a certain amount of stock in the company it targets for an inversion – the new rules state that stock owned by a foreign parent company that was acquired through a separate inversion within three years will not count toward that minimum.

Legal Challenges

There are two areas where Treasury is thought to be on thin ice legally — its rule to limit “recidivist” corporate inverters by tackling multi-step inversions and the guidance on earnings stripping that usesauthority granted to Treasury in 1969 through Section 385 of the tax code.  385 allows Treasury to distinguish debt from equity, but some tax lawyers consider it to be superseded by more recent legislation.  The former problem, regulating multi-step inversions, may run up against the challenge that Treasury cannot decide to unilaterally ignore the manner in which stock is accumulated for inversion purposes.

Although administration officials have claimed that the IRS’ ability to consider some debt as stock would only be utilized under specific conditions, industry lobbyists have claimed that the rule’s broad scope would act to increase the cost of capital for all foreign firms in the United States.

Congressional Action 

Treasury Secreatary Lew said after the release of these new rules that it’s up to Congress to put a stop to inversions permanently – saying that until such legislation passes “… creative accountants and lawyers will continue to seek new ways for companies to move their tax residences overseas and avoid paying taxes here at home.”

Earnings stripping has been the subject of debate for some time now, with Reps. Levin and Van Hollen putting forward a bill to deal with the tactic in February of this year.  Senator Schumer has argued in the past that earnings stripping is the primary reason driving inversions in the first place, saying “the only way to slam the door on inversions for good is to pass tough, strong legislation and reform our tax laws.”

GOP reactions are predictably negative, with Rep. Charles Boustany claiming that “This proposal will do little to stop actual inversions, but will make it more difficult for foreign firms to invest in the United States.”  The new proposals, American Action Forum President Doug Holtz-Eakin said, “have nothing to do with inversions.”

Eye of the Beholder

Complicating matters is that the two parties see earnings stripping in vastly different lights — to Democrats the tactic is a key motivating factor in inversion agreements (See: Sen. Schumer), while Republicans think inversions are driven by a hostile domestic tax system for companies.  JCT last year pointed out that a 2007 Treasury report “did not find conclusive evidence that foreign-controlled domestic corporations are engaged in earnings stripping, and could not determine with precision whether Code section 163(j) is effective in preventing earnings stripping by foreign-controlled domestic corporations.”

Under the new rules, the IRS would have the authority to designate the note created by these deals as stock, not debt – making the interest payments into dividend payments, not eligible for tax deductions.  Treasury: “Specifically, the proposed regulations require key information be documented, including a binding obligation for issuer to repay the principal amount borrowed, creditor’s rights, a reasonable expectation of repayment, and evidence of ongoing debtor-creditor relationship.”

Current inversion laws require that a foreign parent company own a certain amount of stock in the company it targets for an inversion – the new rules state that stock owned by a foreign parent company that was acquired through a separate inversion within three years will not count toward that minimum.

Treasury Secreatary Lew said after the release of these new rules that it’s up to Congress to put a stop to inversions permanently – saying that until such legislation passes “… creative accountants and lawyers will continue to seek new ways for companies to move their tax residences overseas and avoid paying taxes here at home.”

Earnings stripping has been the subject of debate for some time now, with Reps. Levin and Van Hollen putting forward a bill to deal with the tactic in February of this year.  Senator Schumer has argued in the past that earnings stripping is the primary reason driving inversions in the first place, saying “the only way to slam the door on inversions for good is to pass tough, strong legislation and reform our tax laws.”

Republican reactions are predictably negative, with Charles Boustany claiming that “This proposal will do little to stop actual inversions, but will make it more difficult for foreign firms to invest in the United States.”  The new proposals, American Action Forum President Doug Holtz-Eakin said, “have nothing to do with inversions.”

For Democrats’ part, it’s rapidly become gospel that earnings stripping is a critical issue in the inversion problem.  Considering the general strength of feeling that each party has on the matter, support for the new rules will come down along party lines.

Although administration officials have claimed that the IRS’ ability to consider some debt as stock would only be utilized under specific conditions, industry lobbyists have claimed that the rule’s broad scope would act to increase the cost of capital for all foreign firms in the United States.

“Glad to hear Pfizer is calling off the merger.  We need to close the loopholes that let corporations escape paying their taxes,” Clinton said on Twitter.  HRC  would impose further “exit tax” on any company trying to leave U.S. to lower its tax bill.

 

 

 

31 thoughts on “Treasury's New Inversions Rule (Apr. 8)”

  1. Thank you for your entire labor on this web site. My mom take interest in participating in investigations and it is obvious why. A number of us hear all about the compelling form you create both useful and interesting guidelines by means of the blog and boost contribution from other ones about this area of interest and my child has been becoming educated a great deal. Enjoy the remaining portion of the new year. You’re carrying out a fabulous job.

  2. My wife and i have been really more than happy when Louis managed to finish off his researching using the precious recommendations he made through your web site. It is now and again perplexing to simply find yourself making a gift of strategies which often some other people may have been trying to sell. Therefore we realize we need the writer to give thanks to for this. The specific illustrations you made, the straightforward web site navigation, the relationships you will help to instill – it is most remarkable, and it is leading our son in addition to us reason why this subject is interesting, which is seriously pressing. Thanks for the whole lot!

  3. Its like you read my thoughts! You seem to know so much about this, such as you wrote the e-book in it
    or something. I believe that you can do with a
    few % to drive the message home a bit, but instead of that, this
    is wonderful blog. A great read. I’ll certainly be back.
    0mniartist asmr

  4. Hurrah! In the end I got a blog from where I be capable of really take useful information regarding my study and knowledge.
    asmr 0mniartist

  5. I blog often and I seriously appreciate your content.
    This great article has truly peaked my interest. I’m going to
    bookmark your website and keep checking for new information about once a week.
    I opted in for your Feed as well.

  6. Thanks for a marvelous posting! I actually enjoyed reading it,
    you’re a great author.I will make certain to bookmark your blog
    and will come back sometime soon. I want to encourage you to continue your
    great posts, have a nice morning!

  7. This design is incredible! You definitely know how to keep a reader amused.
    Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Fantastic job.
    I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it.
    Too cool!

  8. Great post. I used to be checking continuously this blog and
    I am impressed! Extremely helpful info specifically the last section 🙂 I care for such information a lot.

    I used to be looking for this certain info for a very long time.
    Thank you and best of luck.

  9. scoliosis
    This design is wicked! You most certainly know how to keep
    a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well,
    almost…HaHa!) Wonderful job. I really loved what you had
    to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too
    cool! scoliosis

  10. scoliosis
    My partner and I stumbled over here by a different
    web address and thought I may as well check things out. I like what I see so i am just following you.
    Look forward to looking at your web page again. scoliosis

  11. scoliosis
    Heya i am for the primary time here. I found this board and I find It really helpful & it helped me out much.
    I hope to give something again and aid others such as
    you aided me. scoliosis

  12. I was wondering if you ever considered changing the page layout
    of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got
    to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two pictures.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

  13. I’ve been surfing online more than 4 hours today,
    yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all
    website owners and bloggers made good content as you
    did, the web will be much more useful than ever before.

  14. Its like you read my mind! You seem to know a lot about this,
    like you wrote the book in it or something.
    I think that you can do with a few pics to drive the message
    home a little bit, but other than that, this is wonderful blog.
    A fantastic read. I will definitely be back.

  15. I blog quite often and I seriously thank you for your content.

    Your article has really peaked my interest. I am going to
    book mark your blog and keep checking for new information about
    once per week. I subscribed to your Feed as well.

  16. This design is wicked! You definitely know how
    to keep a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost
    moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Great
    job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it.

    Too cool!

  17. Heya i’m for the primary time here. I came
    across this board and I find It truly useful & it helped me out
    much. I am hoping to offer one thing back and aid others like you helped me.

Leave a Reply to social.microsoft.com Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *